Featured
Table of Contents
Federal financing cuts; attacks on equity, immigrants, the guideline of law, and the country's democracy; a brand-new tax costs; and the growing use of expert system are simply a few of the elements that have actually overthrown the not-for-profit world. Amid this turmoil, how can funders and their grantees prepare for 2026 and beyond? In this special bundle, you'll speak with foundation leaders and significant donors about offering trends in the coming year and efforts to react to Trump administration threats.
You'll discover strong predictions from leaders and thinkers throughout the sector about what lies ahead, including what the sector will look like five years from now, and how to react to what guarantees to be another extraordinary year. It's time to shed our fear and acknowledge that those who want change will fail if individuals closest to the cash do not have the guts to bear the most risk.
Kathleen Enright, president & CEO, Council on Foundations The philanthropic sector need to be clear-eyed about the challenges ahead: the pattern of targeted attacks and federal government overreach developed to suppress our most fundamental freedoms. John Palfrey, president, MacArthur Structure Nonprofits are addicted to the hamster wheel of fundraising, and in 2026, AI might supersize both the wheel and the addiction.
Michael McAfee, CEO, PolicyLink It's difficult to picture passage anytime quickly of legislation requiring higher payout rates. Bella DeVaan and Chuck Collins coordinate the Charity Reform Initiative, Institute for Policy Researches Communication is no longer background sound.
Dimple Abichandani, author of A New Era of Philanthropy. Lighthouse illustration by Greg Mably for The Chronicle of Philanthropy.
Findings from Church Mutual can assist assist nonprofits as they navigate 2026 and changes in generational offering. In December of 2025, the "2026 Charitable Giving Up America" survey was performed by Church Mutual, taking actions from 1,010 grownups who contribute economically to nonprofits and other charitable causes. According to a short article on the study from NonProfitPro, Church Mutual suggests several important patterns within the not-for-profit fundraising world, consisting of the disconcerting reality that donors are planning to downsize their giving up 2026.
The Significance of Professional Services in Supporting Regional MissionsWith that, here are five key takeaways from the Church Mutual 2026 survey: The Church Mutual survey discovered holy places continue to take in the lion's share of contributions. All four generations represented (Gen Z, millennials, Gen X, and Baby Boomers) donated mainly to places of worship, constituting 74% of charitable contributions.
Organizations that have religious ties ought to stress this connection to donors, especially if they actively support homes of worship or schools. Another essential finding from the study was that donors tended to make their contributions toward completion of the year (OctoberDecember). Throughout the 4 generations, end-of-year donations made up the greatest percentage, with JanuaryMarch taking second location, followed by AprilJune, then JulySeptember.
Additionally, out of the four generations, Gen Z was most likely to provide during the slowest time of the year (JulySeptember). Those who work in the not-for-profit area ought to bear in mind of the end-of-year increase in donations, which indicates that OctoberDecember campaigns such as Offering Tuesday occasions, matches, etc, could generate a fundraising windfall.
That stated, "slow-down" durations need to not be ignored, as the younger generations may still be inclined to provide even when the older ones are not. The survey contains a section that details "contribution expectations" for 2026, and it is these findings that might sound alarm bells. On the one hand, around half of donors (48%) said they will not make any changes to their monetary contributions, with Boomers being the group more than likely to leave their charitable giving unchanged.
Millennials were identified as the group more than likely to cut their giving, whereas Gen Z was not only identified as the group least likely to cut their providing, however also the group most likely to increase their giving up 2026. Church Mutual has a few sections committed to the primary financial issues of donors, something that falls beyond the scope of this short article.
One finding that nonprofits must likewise understand is that a bulk of donors have issues about the monetary health of the groups they support. Church Mutual found that 54% of donors are fretted about the financial health of the receivers of their contributions. By generation, Gen Z was the most concerned, followed by millennials and Gen X respectively, while Boomers were the least worried.
They ought to be prepared to address more youthful donors' concerns and be proactive in dealing with any issues affecting the organization internally. Doing so could make a difference in winning over more youthful donors throughout financially unpredictable times. While lower financial contributions may be worrisome for nonprofits, there may be some great news.
When asked if they would increase "time and effort" to assist in other methods ought to they decrease their monetary donations, a majority of donors suggested they would; 26% said they were "most likely" and 32% stated "rather likely," equaling 58% of donors overall. The study recommends these responses might indicate "strong potential to transform lowered monetary providing into more volunteering, advocacy, or other non-financial assistance." In the face of smaller monetary contributions, nonprofits must lean into other channels to engage their donors.
There are other findings from Church Mutual that were not covered in this short article, such as contribution approaches and the leading financial concerns of donors, and so I encourage all those in the not-for-profit space to review the report. The findings from Church Mutual can help direct nonprofits as they navigate 2026, especially as Gen Z begins to take on a more popular function in the offering world.
Sign up for the Johnson Center's email newsletter! This year marks a milestone for the Johnson Center: the tenth edition of our 11 Patterns in Philanthropy report. What began in 2017 as a modest supplement to our annual report has become a widely read and talked about publication, reaching more than 100,000 readers each year.
Normally, these posts check out brand-new shifts or progressing movements across the field of philanthropy. For this tenth edition, nevertheless, we have taken a different approach. Instead of identifying an entirely new set of emerging trends, we have turned our attention backwards to show on the styles that have formed our sector over the past 10 years, and to name both enduring shifts and new developments.
It is also an acknowledgment of the minute we discover ourselves in a minute of hyper disturbance, that integrates both fantastic stress and anxiety about where we are headed and terrific possibility for what could follow. Our future feels more unsure than ever, but the opportunity to develop and scale life-altering developments for our neighborhoods feels present.
As executive orders, legal contests, and legal disputes play out, we do not have a clear photo of just how much federal funding has actually been rescinded or withheld from nonprofits and neighborhoods. We do not understand how numerous nonprofits have closed or will close their doors, how lots of personnel have actually lost their jobs, or how many neighborhoods have actually lost access to vital services.
Latest Posts
Converting Search Traffic to Revenue
Ways to Optimize PPC Budgets for Success
Will GEO Optimization Define 2026 Lead Gen?